Policy Alignment
The ranking percentage combines ideological dimensions and policy issues. Issue priorities affect weight, not the location of your political profile.
40% dimensions · 60% issues
South Africa · local elections
Powered by 
Answer clear questions about public services, rights, the economy and government. We build your political profile first—then compare it with parties using documented evidence.
Anonymous by design. No name is needed, and your result is an explanation—not voting advice.
Methodology
The headline ranking is stated-policy alignment. It is never secretly adjusted by governance, demographics, geography or previous vote.
The ranking percentage combines ideological dimensions and policy issues. Issue priorities affect weight, not the location of your political profile.
40% dimensions · 60% issuesDated political actions are coded separately. Lower evidence coverage stays visible and never silently replaces what a party says.
Separate evidence layerPerformance is assessed only inside a named, comparable sphere and evidence profile. It is not ideological similarity or a universal league table.
Never changes policy matchEvidence before scores
Representation alone does not earn a published match. Every scored party needs sufficient dimensions, issues, primary sources, confidence, rationale and linked evidence.
Public Beta scope
This Beta compares your answers with documented party positions. It does not confirm who is on your ward ballot and does not tell you who to vote for.
Candidate lists and ward-ballot presence are not used in this Beta. Policy evidence determines whether a party comparison can be published.
Ward and candidate-list matching may be introduced later as a separate feature.
Ready when you are
Take the questionnaire, review your answers, and explore every result at your own pace.
Start MATCHmyVOTE